§ 02

The Evidence

Quotes, documents, and images from the public record in this case, each checked against its source before we add it.

What this page is, and is not

Nothing on this page has been tested in court. No judge or jury has weighed any of this evidence, and none of the seven student defendants has been charged with a crime. Items here are what the parties, officials, and news organizations have put on the public record. Each one says who it comes from, where it was published, and how it is labeled, so readers can judge it for themselves.

Catalogue

Search and filter

Primary sources, linked where they were first published. Each one is also cited on the page where it is discussed. What each side and each institution has said, in their own words. Each item links to a page with more context.

C7-E-002

Official statementDisputed

"None of the individuals charged were offered the opportunity to write essays as a sole consequence of their involvement."

Cornell University, Kyle Kimball, vice president for university relations. September 28, 2026.

Source: Cornell statement. Related: Status Tracker

C7-E-005

News reportDisputed

"It is challenging for me to understand how a thorough criminal investigation could have been conducted when she was [sic] never spoke with anyone other than the officer who took her original complaint."

Thomas P. Giuffra, attorney for Jane Doe. Reported September 29, 2026.

Source: ABC News. Related: Status Tracker

C7-E-006

News reportDisputed

The District Attorney "filed no charges against Scott because what alleged did not happen."

Jeremy Saland, attorney for defendant Scott Kretzschmar. Reported September 28, 2026.

Source: NPR. Related: The Seven

C7-E-007

News reportUnresolved

Asked about the photo of the fraternity's Snapchat group chat included in the complaint: "I'm not clear on exactly how that was given to us, or if anyone here looked at it. That was not critical to our analysis." He called the messages "disgusting and vulgar and immoral."

Tompkins County District Attorney Matthew Van Houten, to ABC News. Reported September 29, 2026.

Source: ABC News. Related: Institutional Response, C7-C-08

C7-E-008

News reportDisputed

"This incident was not reported to the Ithaca Police Department. The Ithaca Police Department learned of these allegations recently through the media."

Ithaca Police Department. September 28, 2026.

Source: The Cornell Daily Sun. Related: Status Tracker

C7-E-009

Official statementTompkins County District Attorney

Statement regarding Jane Doe v. Cornell University, et al. (September 28, 2026). Explains the 2024 decision not to file charges, summarizes and quotes Jane Doe's November 2024 sworn statement, and announces that the case will go to a grand jury.

C7-E-018

Court filingNew York County Supreme Court

Jane Doe v. Cornell University, et al., New York County Supreme Court (filed September 2026). We do not link to the complaint because it contains details that could identify the plaintiff and names people who are not parties to the case. We cite it by paragraph number instead.

C7-E-020

Official statementDisputed

Asked whether Cornell provided the Snapchat screenshot to the District Attorney: "The Cornell University Police Department provided it as part of the evidence supplied to the District Attorney in November 2024."

Cornell University, FAQ. Published September 29, 2026.

Source: Cornell FAQ. Related: C7-C-08

C7-E-021

News report

"I support the district attorney's decision to reopen the criminal investigation. But there are also serious questions about Cornell's campus culture and its systems for prevention, reporting, and response. That is why I am calling for outside counsel to conduct a transparent, independent review of the university's response to determine whether Cornell met every obligation to protect its students and pursue justice."

New York Governor Kathy Hochul, in a statement. Reported September 29, 2026.

Source: ABC News. Related: Institutional Response

Images and documents

Images and document excerpts, vetted under the rules above. Each caption says where the image comes from and how it is labeled.

How items are chosen

Where items come from
Court filings, official statements, and established news organizations, in that order of preference. We do not treat social media posts or unverified screenshots as evidence. When we show an image from a court filing, we present it only as what it is: part of one party's filing.
What is checked
We check every quote word for word against its source. We trace every image to the filing or official source it comes from, and link to it there.
What is removed
Before we publish an image, we remove anything that could identify Jane Doe, and the names or faces of anyone who is not a party to the case.
Labels
Each item carries one of the labels defined in the methodology: Alleged, Disputed, Confirmed, or Unresolved.

Last updated September 30, 2026.